![]() ![]() On the other hand, I might classify both the fritzing software and the camera as redundant after taking time to verify the breadboarded circuit works as expected, and updating the schematic as needed to get to that point. Has anyone used fritzing software for this specific purpose ? Now it occurs to me that using the camera for this purpose will also take a great deal of extra room (space) whereas fritzing software no extra room at all. (things that make snapping a photograph harder and/or more time-consuming). However, I might need to get other things like light umbrella, camera flash, tripod for camera, tripod for camera flash, etc., in order to use the camera. ![]() ![]() If fritzing does the job but is hard to use, I might prefer to buy a digital camera and use it instead. I guess it will be ease-of-use that chooses the tool for me. However, a digital camera might do the same thing more easily. I was thinking of using it to document prototypes on breadboards that work. I downloaded fritzing software on linux, but haven’t used it yet. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |